1. Charism and the Priesthood in the Apostolic Tradition
The inseparable union of God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, in the mystery of divine economy in Christ—from the creation of the material world to its eschatological fulfillment—is expressed in the biblical, liturgical, and patristic tradition, through both mutually supportive ministry, and their distinct roles in salvation history.
This mutual ministry of distinct roles within the inseparable union of the Son and the Holy Spirit shares a common and immutable mode: not only the incarnation of the Son and Word of God and His whole earthly life until His ascension, but also the outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles and the earthly Church on Pentecost. This ensures the continuous and visible confirmation of the real presence of Christ in the life of the Church through the divine Eucharist “until the end of the age” (1 Cor. 11:26).
Christ Himself established the reasons and modes for the visible affirmation of His real presence in the earthly Church, always in cooperation with the Holy Spirit. This includes the authority granted to the apostles when Christ breathed the Holy Spirit upon them, after the Resurrection, and before the Ascension (Matt. 28:18-20; John 20:21-23; Acts 1:7-8).
This authority empowered them to preach the Gospel to all nations, baptize believers, ordain successors, establish a permanent priesthood, and organize local Christian communities, by virtue of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost (Acts 2:1-4). This was inseparably linked to Christ’s command at the Last Supper to continually celebrate the Eucharistic meal, preserving the “invocation” and “remembrance” of His real presence in the Church’s life (Matt. 26:26-29; Mark 14:22-25; Luke 22:14-20; John 6:47-58; 1 Cor. 10:15-17; 11:23-29).
From this perspective, the greatest charism of Christ to His Church, after the sending of the Holy Spirit, is the conferral of His authority upon the apostles and their successors through apostolic succession of episcopal authority. This authority is absolutely essential for the celebration, confirmation, and manifestation of the ecclesiological depth, not only of the Eucharist, but also of the entire sacramental life of the Church. The uninterrupted continuity of apostolic succession in faith and order, within episcopal authority, simultaneously guarantees the unbroken transmission of the apostolic tradition in both faith and sacramental life. In this light, Martin Luther explicitly rejected the sacrament of Priesthood, arguing that it generates all other sacraments.
Protestant theology, particularly that of the prominent Lutheran theologian A. von Harnack, erroneously proposes a dichotomous distinction between a “superior universal order of charismatic itinerants” (apostles, prophets, evangelists, teachers), and an “inferior order” of non-charismatic local clergy (bishops, priests, and deacons). This theory, however, contradicts the Pauline teaching on the diversity of the Holy Spirit’s charisms (1 Cor. 12:1-31; Rom. 12:3-8; Eph. 4:10-12). The New Testament emphasizes a hierarchical ordering of spiritual gifts, urging believers to “earnestly desire the higher gifts” (1 Cor. 12:31) for the harmonious functioning of the Church.
2. Protestant Autonomy of Charism from the Priesthood
The Protestant rejection of the sacrament of priesthood stems from post-Schism (1054) theological and ecclesiological confusions, systematized by scholastic theologians like Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274). Aquinas’ dichotomous framework influenced Protestant theology, distinguishing between the “visible Church” (rooted in Christ’s Incarnation and earthly life) and the “spiritual Church” (guided by the Holy Spirit post-Pentecost). This framework led to the separation of inner spiritual faith from external liturgical acts, prioritizing personal faith over sacramental mediation.
Protestant Reformers like Luther and Calvin emphasized direct personal communion with the Holy Spirit, rejecting sacraments and hierarchical mediation. A. Von Harnack further distorted this by divorcing “charism” from apostolic succession, misinterpreting early Church texts like the Didache (75-85 AD) to support his theory. However, historical evidence—such as the ordination of Timothy and Titus by Paul (1 Tim. 4:14; 2 Tim. 1:6; Tit. 1:5)—demonstrates that charismatic ministry and hierarchical order were intertwined from the beginning.
3. Impact of Western Spirit-Centered Theology on Orthodox Theology
The dichotomous theology of the West influenced figures like J.-A. Möhler (1786-1838), whose “spirit-centered” ecclesiology sought dialogue with Protestantism, but risked divorcing the Holy Spirit’s work from Christ’s incarnational reality. Russian Slavophile thinkers like A. Khomiakov, (1806–1860), adopted similar ideas, promoting a “charismatic ecclesiology” (sobornost’) that prioritized the Spirit’s inner workings over institutional structures. However, this approach neglects the Christocentric ontology of the Church as the eternal historical Body of Christ, affirmed by the Fathers and liturgical tradition.
Orthodoxy maintains the inseparable synergy of Christ and the Holy Spirit in the divine economy. The Church, as Christ’s Body, is sustained by the Eucharist—the visible manifestation of His real presence—and the apostolic succession of bishops, who ensure the continuity of Christ’s authority. Any attempt to separate “Charism” from “Priesthood” undermines this mystery, as both are rooted in the indivisible work of the Son and the Spirit.
—
4. The Unity of Charism and Priesthood in Orthodox Theology
Orthodox theology steadfastly affirms the inseparable unity of charism (χάρισμα) and priesthood (ἱερωσύνη) as two dimensions of the same divine mystery. This unity is rooted in the synergy of Christ and the Holy Spirit, who together, animate the Church as the eternal historical Body of Christ. The Church’s sacramental life, particularly the Eucharist, manifests this synergy: the ordained priesthood, through apostolic succession, ensures the continuity of Christ’s authority, while the Holy Spirit’s charisms sanctify and empower the faithful.
Apostolic Succession as the Foundation of Charismatic Continuity
The Apostles, endowed with Christ’s authority by his “breathing” of the Holy Spirit upon them, (John 20:22), established local churches by ordaining bishops (ἐπίσκοποι), and presbyters (πρεσβύτεροι). These successors, like Timothy and Titus, received not only institutional authority but also the charism of truth (χάρισμα τῆς ἀληθείας), as articulated by St. Irenaeus (Against Heresies IV.26.2). This charism safeguards apostolic teaching, and guarantees the authenticity of sacraments, particularly the Eucharist, which makes Christ’s presence “visible” until His Second Coming (1 Cor. 11:26).
Critique of Protestant Dichotomies
Protestant theology, influenced by A. Von Harnack, misinterprets early Christian texts like the Didache to suggest a divide between itinerant “charismatic” “prophets”, and local clergy. However, historical evidence—such as St. Paul’s ordination of Timothy (1 Tim. 4:14) and Titus (Tit. 1:5)—reveals that early Christian communities integrated charismatic and hierarchical elements. The Didache itself instructs communities to honor prophets who conform to liturgical norms (Didache 13:1-3), rejecting false charisms divorced from ecclesial order.
The Eucharist: Nexus of Charism and Priesthood
In Orthodox theology, the Eucharist epitomizes the unity of charism and priesthood. The celebrant (ἱερεύς), ordained through apostolic succession, invokes the Holy Spirit (ἐπίκλησις) to transform the gifts, while the faithful participate in the charisms of the Spirit (1 Cor. 12:7-11). This synergy reflects the broader mystery of the Church: Christ acts through the priesthood, and the Holy Spirit sanctifies through the charisms, yet both are united in the one Body.
5. Modern Theological Challenges and Orthodox Responses
Western Influences: From Möhler to Khomiakov
The 19th-century Roman Catholic theologian J.A. Möhler, attempted to reconcile Protestant and Catholic ecclesiology, by emphasizing the Holy Spirit’s role in fostering unity. However, his spirit-centered approach risked marginalizing Christ’s incarnational and institutional presence. Similarly, the Russian Slavophile Aleksei Khomiakov, (1806–1860), proposed a model of sobornost’ (conciliarity), prioritizing the Spirit’s work in the Church’s communal life. While enriching Orthodox dialogue with the West, Khomiakov’s framework occasionally downplayed the necessity of apostolic succession and sacramental priesthood, leading to critiques by theologians like Georges Florovsky, who reasserted the Christocentric ontology of the Church.
The Vatican II Paradigm and Orthodox Caution
The Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) adopted a more inclusive view of charisms, acknowledging the Holy Spirit’s activity beyond canonical boundaries (Lumen Gentium 12). While fostering ecumenical dialogue, this approach risks diluting the Orthodox insistence on the indivisibility of truth and grace, within the sacramental and hierarchical Church. Orthodoxy maintains that while the Spirit’s energies permeate creation, the fullness of charism resides in the Eucharist and apostolic tradition.
6. Conclusion: Toward a Holistic Ecclesiology
The Orthodox Church witnesses to the undivided mystery of Christ and the Holy Spirit, rejecting dichotomies between the institutional aspect of the Church and her clerical order, and charism. The priesthood, rooted in apostolic succession, and the charisms, bestowed by the Spirit, are complementary gifts ensuring the Church’s fidelity to its divine mission. As St. John Chrysostom proclaimed, “The Church is the flesh of Christ”, (Homily on Ephesians 1:1), a reality sustained by the Eucharist, and the unbroken chain of apostolic succession and episcopal ordinations.
Any theology divorcing charism from the priesthood fractures the Church’s ontological unity, reducing it to either a human institution, or a disembodied spiritualism. In contrast, Orthodoxy offers a vision where hierarchy and charism, like Christ and the Spirit, work in harmony—a mystery transcending human logic, yet revealed in the communion of saints.